This is the full text of Enoch Powell's so-called 'Rivers of Blood' speech, which was delivered to a Conservative Association meeting in Birmingham on April 20 1968.
The supreme
function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. […] Those
who knowingly shirk it deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of
those who come after.
A week or
two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite
ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalised industries.
After a
sentence or two about the weather, he suddenly said: "If I had the money
to go, I wouldn't stay in this country. I have three children, I shan't be
satisfied till I have seen them all settled overseas. In this country in 15 or
20 years' time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man."
I can
already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing?
How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a
conversation?
The answer
is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow
Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of
Parliament, that his country will not be worth living in for his children.
In 15 or 20
years, on present trends, there will be in this country three and a half
million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure.
That is the official figure given to parliament by the spokesman of the
Registrar General's Office.
There is no
comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of
five to seven million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population. Of
course, it will not be evenly distributed from Margate to Aberystwyth and from
Penzance to Aberdeen. Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will
be occupied by sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.
It is this
fact which creates the extreme urgency of action now, of just that kind of
action which is hardest for politicians to take, action where the difficulties
lie in the present but the evils to be prevented or minimised lie several
parliaments ahead.
The natural
and rational first question with a nation confronted by such a prospect is to
ask: "How can its dimensions be reduced?"
The answers
to the simple and rational question are equally simple and rational: by
stopping, or virtually stopping, further inflow, and by promoting the maximum
outflow.
Those whom
the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad,
as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who
are for the most part the material of the future growth of the
immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in
heaping up its own funeral pyre.
In these
circumstances nothing will suffice but that the total inflow for settlement
should be reduced at once to negligible proportions, and that the necessary
legislative and administrative measures be taken without delay.
I turn to
re-emigration. If all immigration ended tomorrow, the rate of growth of the
immigrant and immigrant-descended population would be substantially reduced,
but the prospective size of this element in the population would still leave
the danger unaffected. This can only be tackled while a considerable proportion
of the total still comprises persons who entered this country during the last
ten years or so.
Hence the
urgency now of the encouragement of re-emigration.
Nobody can
estimate the numbers which, with generous assistance, would choose either to
return to their countries of origin or to go to other countries anxious to
receive the manpower and the skills they represent.
Even
immigrants in my own constituency from time to time come to me, asking if I can
find them assistance to return home. If such a policy were adopted and pursued
with the determination which the gravity of the alternative justifies, the
resultant outflow could appreciably alter the prospects.
The third
element of the Conservative Party's policy is that all who are in this country
as citizens should be equal before the law and that there shall be no
discrimination or difference made between them by public authority. We will
have no "first-class citizens" and "second-class citizens."
This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendent should be elevated
into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his
right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one
fellow-citizen and another.
The
discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and of resentment, lies
not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and
are still coming.
This is why
to enact legislation of the kind before parliament at this moment is to risk
throwing a match on to gunpowder. The kindest thing that can be said about
those who propose and support it is that they know not what they do.
The
Commonwealth immigrant came to Britain as a full citizen, to a country which
knew no discrimination between one citizen and another, and he entered
instantly into the possession of the rights of every citizen, from the vote to
free treatment under the National Health Service.
But while,
to the immigrant, entry to this country was admission to privileges and
opportunities, the impact upon the existing population was very different. For
they found themselves made strangers in their own country.
They found
their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable
to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond
recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they
found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards
of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to
hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now
the unwanted.
The sense
of being a persecuted minority which is growing among ordinary English people
in the areas of the country which are affected is something that those without
direct experience can hardly imagine.
I am going
to allow just one of those hundreds of people to speak for me:
“Eight
years ago in a respectable street in Wolverhampton a house was sold to a Negro.
Now only one white (a woman old-age pensioner) lives there. This is her story.
She lost her husband and both her sons in the war. So she turned her
seven-roomed house, her only asset, into a boarding house. She worked hard and
did well, paid off her mortgage and began to put something by for her old age.
Then the immigrants moved in. With growing fear, she saw one house after
another taken over. The quiet street became a place of noise and confusion.
Regretfully, her white tenants moved out.
“The day
after the last one left, she was awakened at 7am by two Negroes who wanted to
use her 'phone to contact their employer. When she refused, as she would have
refused any stranger at such an hour, she was abused.
“When she
goes to the shops, she is followed by children, charming, wide-grinning
piccaninnies. They cannot speak English, but one word they know.
"Racialist," they chant. When the new Race Relations Bill is passed,
this woman is convinced she will go to prison.”
The other
dangerous delusion is summed up in the word "integration." To be
integrated into a population means to become for all practical purposes
indistinguishable from its other members.
There are
among the Commonwealth immigrants many thousands whose wish and purpose is to
be integrated and whose every thought and endeavour is bent in that direction.
But to
imagine that such a thing enters the heads of a great and growing majority of
immigrants and their descendants is a ludicrous misconception, and a dangerous
one.
We are on
the verge here of a change.
Now we are
seeing the growth of positive forces acting against integration, with a view to
the exercise of actual domination, first over fellow-immigrants and then over
the rest of the population. The words I am about to use, are those of a Labour
Member of Parliament who is a minister in the present government:
'The Sikh
communities' campaign to maintain customs inappropriate in Britain is much to
be regretted. Working in Britain, particularly in the public services, they
should be prepared to accept the terms and conditions of their employment. To
claim special communal rights leads to a dangerous fragmentation within
society. '
All credit
to John Stonehouse for having had the insight to perceive that, and the courage
to say it.
The
immigrant communities can organise to consolidate their members, to agitate and
campaign against their fellow citizens, and to dominate the rest with the legal
weapons which the ignorant have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with
foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see "the River Tiber foaming with
much blood."
Only
resolute and urgent action will avert it even now. Whether there will be the
public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know. All I know is that
to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.