The Times Issue 66,666 - November 8, 1999
The first edition of what was to become The Times
BY ALAN HAMILTON
In the unlikely event that you have studied the date
at the top of this page, you may have noticed that it is also the 66,666th
issue of a newspaper that was born on New Year's Day, 1785.
We are not the oldest: several provincial sheets are
our senior, and the venerable Herald of Glasgow marginally predates us, as does
the specialist shipping journal Lloyd's List, but we shall not let that spoil
the party. All the national daily newspapers of today are our grandchildren.
The mileometer clocked up a neat number on February
22, 1806, when we reached issue No 6,666. Lord Grenville had just formed the
ministry of all the talents following the death of his cousin, William Pitt,
broken by the news of Napoleon's victory at Austerlitz.
We were a modest publication then, a single sheet
folded into four pages, with a circulation of about 2,500. But only a month
before we had gone to the cutting edge of technology by printing our first
picture ‑ a woodcut of the catafalque that would bear Horatio Nelson's
body to his state funeral.
It was December 7, 1820, by the time we reached issue
No 11,111, and King George IV had lately succeeded his father in what had been
the longest reign in the history of the British Crown. Wordsworth had just
published a guidebook to the Lake District, Keats had published a collection
that included the nightingale and the Grecian urn, and the House of Lords came
close to divesting Queen Caroline of her regality on the ground of an
adulterous liaison with an Italian gentleman.
That day's issue reported that Caroline had written to
her estranged husband, George IV, interceding in the case of one Sarah Price,
who was condemned to be executed the following Tuesday.
Greater events had recently happened behind the scenes
at The Times. The newspaper was the first in Britain to introduce the steam
printing press, which could produce 1,100 copies an hour compared with the 250‑an‑hour
hand presses essentially unchanged since the days of Caxton. Our circulation
would soon climb to 30,000 a day.
The numerals on the mileometer line up at intervals of
between 35 and 40 years. We reached issue No 22,222 on November 27, 1855, at
the height of the Crimean War, where our bold reporter William Howard Russell
invented the post of fearless war correspondent and infuriated the Government
back home with the honesty of his dispatches from the front.
Lord Palmerston, the Foreign Secretary, took
particular exception to the treatment he received in our columns. He wrote to
Queen Victoria: "The Times, in order to increase its circulation, criticises
freely everybody and everything."
We sold for fivepence, and our circulation soared to
60,000 a day, four times that of all our rivals put together. Times dispatches
from the war were unrivalled, and required reading. The Government reluctantly
abandoned stamp duty on newspapers that year, a move that gave birth to a rash
of penny sheets, including The Daily Telegraph.
The figures next lined up on May 25, 1891, when we
reached issue No 33,333. The first international telephone call, from London to
Paris, had just been made, and WH Smith had just refused to stock a
"filthy" new book by Oscar Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray.
Dumbarton became the first champions of the new Scottish Football League.
Things were going less well at The Times. The paper
had recently published a series of letters implicating the great Irish politician
Charles Parnell in a series of murders in Phoenix Park, Dublin.
The letters were shown to be forgeries and the legal
costs almost broke the newspaper, eventually driving it into the saving
ownership of Lord Northcliffe, founder of the Daily Mail and the man who had invented
popular journalism for a newly literate working class. We survived his reign,
although we had to suffer such innovations as photographs. We had more to
celebrate on December 2, 1926, when issue No 44,444 rolled off the press. Alone
among national dailies, The Times had managed uninterrupted publication throughout
the nine days of the General Strike, thanks to the efforts of pensioners,
apprentices and even journalists manning the presses.
But it was a close‑run thing. Winston Churchill,
then Home Secretary, seized most of our newsprint supplies to produce his own
propagandist British Gazette, and on the first night of the strike we were
reduced to printing 48,000 copies of a single sheet on a duplicating machine.
But an issue is an issue, however shrunken.
By the time we reached issue No 55,555, Britten's War
Requiem was having its first performance for the inauguration of the new
Coventry Cathedral, and a quartet of no‑hope rock musicians from
Liverpool calling themselves The Beatles were being refused a recording
contract by Decca.
A former Edinburgh milkman, Sean Connery, was enjoying
unexpected cinema success in Dr No, the filmed version of a novel by Ian
Fleming. Sir Laurence Olivier was named first director of the National Theatre,
and the first live television pictures were bounced between Britain and America
via the Telstar satellite.
In contrast to the white‑hot progress being made
elsewhere, The Times still clung to a solemn front page of small ads. We
entered the brash modern era four years later and have never really looked
back. Our circulation is now about 735,000.
Those milestone issues, for all their mathematical
neatness, are random editions of a journal that has been appearing six days a
week for the best part of 215 years. They are not more significant than
celebrating the 2,000th anniversary of Christ's birth a year too early. In
truth, nothing much happened on those neat‑number days.
But then, that's
the trouble with the news. It catches you when you least expect it.